Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Raymond Sarmiento vs Hugo Di Feo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sarmiento vs Feo analysis and find out who is favored!
Raymond Sarmiento vs Hugo Di Feo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sarmiento 1 - 0 Feo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sarmiento has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Feo has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sarmiento, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Feo has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sarmiento has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Feo has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sarmiento has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Feo winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sarmiento has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 48/ 23), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13). Feo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 25/ 10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 16/ 26).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sarmiento winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sarmiento winning 2 and Feo winning 0. The last match between Sarmiento and Feo was at the Granby Challenger, 19-07-2015, Q3, Hard with Raymond Sarmiento getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:33.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sarmiento and Feo have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sarmiento winning 0 times and Feo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sarmiento winning 0, and Feo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sarmiento has played against opponents with an average rank of while Feo has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sarmiento has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Feo has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sarmiento has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Feo has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
882
Rank
287
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
896
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
59% (169-117)
Career Total W/L
50% (51-51)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$30,950
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Raymond Sarmiento | Hugo Di Feo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:33 | 1:19:33 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (44/70) | 71% (55/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 52% (23/44) | 58% (32/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 85% (22/26) | 41% (9/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (36/77) | 36% (25/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Hugo Di Feo
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
85%
(
22 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Raymond Sarmiento | Hugo Di Feo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Raymond Sarmiento Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
8
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Gabriel Diallo
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Alexander Brown
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Sebastian Gima
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Shunsuke Mitsui
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
99)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Yankel Zemel
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
11
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(0) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Sarkissian
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Gonzalez
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 7-6(3) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-5 3-6 9-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Hugo Di Feo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Hugo Di Feo
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Di Feo
Player
Alexis Galarneau
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bradley Mousley
Player
Hugo Di Feo
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Hugo Di Feo
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Di Feo
Player
Roy Smith
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
63%
(
22 of
35)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
42%
(
13 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
36
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Di Feo
Player
Winston Lin
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve %
84%
(
16 of
19)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
26
Total Points Won
13
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikelis Libietis
Player
Hugo Di Feo
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
69%
(
79 of
114)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
11
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
50 of
79)
35%
(
17 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
114)
113
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Sarmiento Vs Feo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
